Skip to main content
  • Overview
  • Jul '24
    Research paper: Low carbon lifestyles are supported, but are impacted by ‘narratives of delay’
  • Apr '24
    Europe Talks Flying: Navigating public opinion on aviation and climate
  • Feb '24
    Video: People want climate action so why don’t politicians get it?
  • Nov '23
    National Trust report: A Resilience Bill could put adaptation on the same footing as mitigation
  • Oct '23
    More in Common: Labour can increase support among key Red Wall ‘Loyal Nationals’ by focusing on green investment
  • Sep '23
    Anger Monitor research: ‘constructive’ anger can motivate climate action
  • More in Common: Oil & gas are no longer seen as reliable energy sources
  • Jul '23
    More in Common research: voters outside of London were not paying close attention to the extension of ULEZ
  • May '23
    Research paper: Climate-induced migration is not a route to greater climate concern
  • Apr '23
    More in Common: Britain’s ‘quiet majority’ want less talk and more action on green energy
  • Mar '23
    OFFSHORE documentary explores what the energy transition means for workers and communities around the North Sea
  • Jun '22
    Mapping worry about climate change
  • May '22
    COP26: What the public heard
  • Jun '21
    Research paper: High carbon lifestyles can undermine climate messaging
  • Jan '21
    Climate Outreach resource: Lifestyle change & system change are two sides of the same coin
  • Dec '20
    UN Environment Programme report: the importance of lifestyle change for closing the ’emissions gap’
  • Oct '20
    Britain Talks Climate: Most people are unsure which party has best climate policies
  • CAST data portal: support for lifestyle change in the UK (vs Brazil, China & Sweden)
  • Nov '18
    ‘One thousand ways to experience loss’
Content Type

From the Climate Community

Filter content Please note: The page will automatically update when any filters are changed or set.
    From the Climate Community 20th October 2020

    Britain Talks Climate: Most people are unsure which party has best climate policies

    The majority of British people are unsure which party has the best climate policies, according to the Britain Talks Climate toolkit.

    “Despite high levels of concern overall, the majority of segments are not engaging with climate change in terms of politics or policies. When asked which UK party they felt had the best climate change policies, the most frequent response from most segments was either “none of the above” or “don’t know”. Progressive Activists and Civic Pragmatists were exceptions, with the majority citing the Green Party as having the best climate policy.”

    The ambiguity people feel about which political party has the best climate policies is an invitation to make a clearer offer to the electorate.

    A stacked bar chart showing seven segments
    • Source: Climate Outreach
    • Date: 20th October 2020
    From the Climate Community 5th October 2020

    CAST data portal: support for lifestyle change in the UK (vs Brazil, China & Sweden)

    The centre for Climate Change & Social Transformations (CAST) carried out a set of global surveys with over 3000 participants from Brazil, China, Sweden and the UK in 2020 (the survey is repeated annually)

    Large majorities from across borders, age divides and financial backgrounds were positive on the need for action on climate change.

    Click through to the CAST dashboard to filter the results further.

    From the Climate Community 24th November 2018

    ‘One thousand ways to experience loss’

    An article by Petra Tschakert and colleagues synthesises the depth and breadth of tangible and intangible losses that people around the world may experience as a result of climate change. Key takeaways include:

    • There is a need for more data from low income countries, which represented only 11% of case studies reviewed
    • Damage is observed across the world, and loss and at-risk sentiments are reported in nearly all regions
    • For indigenous groups, values such as culture, lifestyle, traditions and heritage, sense of place, identity, self-determination were seen as most imperiled. For nonindigenous groups, there was proportionally more evidence of harms to human life, economic outcomes, and dignity being imperiled
    • Current research likely significantly underestimates non-economic loss and damage for people living in low-income nations
Loading more posts...

Add Feedback