Skip to main content
  • Overview
  • Oct '26
    Tracker data: Scots and Londoners seeing the most climate measures
  • Sep '26
    Tracker data: Measures to address climate not evenly experienced
  • Aug '26
    As climate impacts intensify, who should pay for the costs?
  • Jun '26
    How did climate show up at the 2026 elections?
  • May '26
    Reform voters: getting the climate story right
  • Apr '26
    What does climate ‘salience’ mean in 2026?
  • Mar '26
    Has the Green Party really stopped talking about the environment?
  • Feb '26
    Varied levels of support for individual net zero policies
  • Nov '25
    The Autumn Budget and public opinion – bills, taxes, and more
  • The 30th climate change ‘Conference of Parties’
  • Sep '25
    Zack Polanski elected leader of greens
  • Oct '24
    New study addresses global awareness of climate justice
  • Aug '24
    Labour’s energy policies are popular, but concerns around energy costs are growing again
  • Is ‘climate crisis’ a more effective term than ‘climate change’?
  • May '24
    Tracker data: The public blames government and the energy system (not green initiatives) for high bills
  • Tracker data: Majority of public think climate inaction will cost too much
  • Feb '24
    Survey: Three quarters of the public are worried about the impact of climate change on their bills
  • Jan '24
    Tracker data: The youngest and the poorest are most worried about climate and wellbeing
  • Nov '23
    Tracker data: Nearly half of British public support climate compensation
  • Tracker data: MPs and public support climate finance to vulnerable countries
  • Comment: Climate vs the cost of living?
  • Tracker data: Who is to blame for the high cost of energy bills?
  • Oct '23
    Tracker data: Majority of the public support a tax on frequent flyers
  • National Infrastructure Commission recommends low income households should be given free heat pumps
  • Sep '23
    Onward polling: Voters rank green policies as the least likely reason for cost of living crisis
  • Public First: Sunak’s Net Zero speech may scarcely cut through to voters
  • Greenpeace polling: Blue Wall constituents want subsidies for net zero policies (and will vote on climate)
  • Do people think net zero will be expensive, or can the costs fall fairly?
  • Aug '23
    Progressive Policy Institute report: working class voters’ views on climate policies
  • Ipsos polling: Voters have an appetite for helping the environment alongside concerns about affordability
  • Dec '22
    Understanding support for the frequent flyer levy
  • ECIU report: What is the cost of ‘Not Zero’?
  • Oct '22
    Tracker Methodology
  • Message testing guide: How to talk about the cost of living and climate crises at the same time
  • Oct '21
    Climate Just map: Climate vulnerability in the UK
  • Nov '18
    ‘One thousand ways to experience loss’
Topic

Cost of Living & Equity

Filter content Please note: The page will automatically update when any filters are changed or set.
  • The Latest

    To a backdrop of insatiable global economics and energy markets, millions are struggling with their household finances. It’s no surprise then that the cost of living crisis has been the dominant issue in opinion polls over recent years.

    The issues surrounding costs and fairness weave into every aspect of the climate transition – from the unequal impacts of heat, floods and storms; to agreement with climate narratives, to the barriers and enablers of household climate actions.

    With rising costs and acute financial struggles the dominant concern in opinion polls, how has this impacted the climate insights?

  • Climate Barometer Tracker 21st October 2022

    Tracker Methodology

    The Climate Barometer tracker typically runs twice a year in spring and autumn, providing an up-to-date assessment of MP and public opinion on climate change over time. Occasionally we deviate from this pattern to capture other important moments, for instance, the 2024 UK General Election.

    Questionnaires

    The surveys include core questions that are repeated over several waves, designed to enable us to track trends, changes in sentiment and narratives., and topical questions on current issues are included as they emerge. You can explore some of our questionnaires in the blocks below.

    Data collection

    Wave 1 (Oct 2022) through Wave 8 (Oct 2025) were conducted through YouGov, who administered both the MP and the general public survey. From Wave 9 (Aug 2026) onwards, both surveys are administered by Savanta. Care has been taken to ensure that sampling, questionnaire administration, weighting and data quality are as consistent as possible in this change, but we accept that there will be some differences in panel providers, or ‘house’ effects visible in the data.

    The MP sample consists of around 100 current UK MPs, weighted to be representative of the distribution of parliament. This means that the representation of MPs across different parties depends on their representation in parliament. Currently the numbers of MPs from Labour and Conservative parties are large enough to conduct cross-party comparisons, but this is not the case for other parties.

    The public sample consists of around 2000 members of the general public, weighted for representativeness of the UK population.

    Accessing our data

    Below is a link to a library of data visualisations created from the analyses from our tracker. They can also be found throughout the Climate Barometer topic threads. If you’re interested in a question, topic, or breakdown that isn’t shown on our website, feel free to reach out and request it.

    From the Climate Community 24th November 2018

    ‘One thousand ways to experience loss’

    An article by Petra Tschakert and colleagues synthesises the depth and breadth of tangible and intangible losses that people around the world may experience as a result of climate change. Key takeaways include:

    • There is a need for more data from low income countries, which represented only 11% of case studies reviewed
    • Damage is observed across the world, and loss and at-risk sentiments are reported in nearly all regions
    • For indigenous groups, values such as culture, lifestyle, traditions and heritage, sense of place, identity, self-determination were seen as most imperiled. For nonindigenous groups, there was proportionally more evidence of harms to human life, economic outcomes, and dignity being imperiled
    • Current research likely significantly underestimates non-economic loss and damage for people living in low-income nations
Loading more posts...

Add Feedback