Tracker data: Mandate for more government action on climate stays strong

Latest Climate Barometer tracking finds that people in Scotland and London are most likely to have seen measures to address climate change in their local area.

As highlighted in the chart below, people in Scotland are most likely to have noticed

• EV charging stations in their area, especially compared to those in Northern Ireland and the North of England
• More solar panels and heat pumps on buildings
• More traffic reduction measures
• Flood defences

Londoners are similar, but also noting more EV infrastructure, traffic reduction measures and flood defences. Londoners are also by far the most likely of all regions to have seen heat reduction measures implemented in their area.

Those in the North of England, Wales, England’s East and the Midlands, and the South are more likely than those in Scotland and London to say that they have seen ‘none of the above’ in their area.

This data points to emerging evidence for gaps and inequalities in the regional implementation of climate measures, building on other Climate Barometer tracker data showing income gaps around the same measures.

Policies proposed to address climate change are varied in scope. Our latest Climate Barometer tracker looks at whether many of these policies are seen by the public as ‘climate policies’ or whether they are believed to be targeting other issues.

Some policies are seen as primarily addressing climate change:

• Phasing out petrol and diesel vehicles by 2035 (60%), with 25% also saying this is aimed at improving health and wellbeing
• Expanding renewable energy generation in the UK (58%), but also seen as lowering household bills and costs (38%), and encouraging economic growth and creating jobs (29%)
• Ultra low emissions zones (57%), which are also seen as aiming to improve health and wellbeing (45%)
• A tax on frequent fliers is primarily seen as a climate policy (45%)
• Community control and benefit from their own renewable energy (41%), but also a measure for lowering household bills and encouraging jobs and growth (35%)

Many policies that involve improving the natural environment are seen as ‘protecting nature’ rather than tackling or responding/adapting to climate change:

• Restoring habitats and planting more trees is seen by most as protecting nature and wildlife (79%)
• Investment in green and blue spaces is seen as a measure to protect nature and wildlife (68%)
• Cleaning up oceans and rivers is seen as a measure to protect nature and wildlife (76)%

Other urban infrastructure and design policies tend also to be seen as primarily addressing other issues:

• Insulating homes is seen primarily as a measure to lower bills and costs (68%)
• 15 minute neighbourhoods is seen by most as a measure to improve health and wellbeing (56%)
• Investing in public transport is seen as mainly encouraging growth and jobs (40%)

And policies aiming to target the wealthy/ polluting groups are also less likely to be seen as outright climate policies

• A windfall tax on energy company and oil & gas profits is mainly seen as a measure to lower household bills and costs (37%), with 33% saying it is a climate policy
• A tax on the ultra rich is primarily seen as a measure to tackle inequality (51%)

Policies often have multiple aims and goals, and whether policies are seen as ‘climate’ policies is not a problem in and of itself. In many cases, a climate policy being seen as a cost of living or nature protection measure may mean a wider section of society see its benefits. Crucially, it is important to be aware of how various policies are being ‘read’ by the public, and whether or not the aims of the policy are being understood.